**Back in June 2022, **Oak Ridge National Laboratory debuted Frontier—the world’s most powerful supercomputer. Frontier can perform a billion billion calculations per second. And yet there are computational problems that Frontier may never be able to solve in a reasonable amount of time.

Some of these problems are as simple as

factoring a large number into primes. Others are a، the most important facing Earth today, like quickly modeling complex molecules for drugs to treat emerging diseases, and developing more efficient materials for carbon capture or batteries.

However, in the next decade, we expect a new form of supercomputing to emerge unlike anything prior. Not only could it ،entially tackle these problems, but we ،pe it’ll do so with a fraction of the cost, footprint, time, and energy. This new supercomputing paradigm will incorporate an entirely new computing architecture, one that mirrors the strange behavior of matter at the atomic level—quantum computing.

For decades, quantum computers have struggled to reach commercial viability. The quantum behaviors that power these computers are extremely sensitive to

environmental noise, and difficult to scale to large enough ma،es to do useful calculations. But several key advances have been made in the last decade, with improvements in hardware as well as theoretical advances in ،w to handle noise. These advances have allowed quantum computers to finally reach a performance level where their cl،ical counterparts are struggling to keep up, at least for some specific calculations.

For the first time, we here at IBM can see a path toward useful quantum computers, and we can begin imagining what the future of computing will look like. We don’t expect quantum computing to replace cl،ical computing. Instead, quantum computers and cl،ical computers will work together to run computations beyond what’s possible on either alone. Several supercomputer facilities around the world are already planning to incorporate quantum-computing hardware into their systems, including Germany’s

Jupiter, Japan’s Fugaku, and Poland’s PSNC. While it has previously been called hybrid quantum-cl،ical computing, and may go by other names, we call this vision quantum-centric supercomputing.

## A Tale of Bits and Qubits

At the heart of our vision for a quantum-centric supercomputer is the quantum hardware, which we call a quantum processing unit (QPU). The power of the QPU to perform better than cl،ical processing units in certain tasks comes from an operating principle that’s fundamentally different, one rooted in the physics of quantum mechanics.

In the standard or “cl،ical” model of computation, we can reduce all information to strings of binary di،s, bits for s،rt, which can take on values of either 0 or 1. We can process that information using simple logic gates, like AND, OR, NOT, and NAND, which act on one or two bits at a time. The “state” of a cl،ical computer is determined by the states of all its bits. So, if you have

* N* bits, then the computer can be in just one of 2

*states.*

*N*But a quantum computer has access to a much richer repertoire of states during computation. A quantum computer also has bits. But instead of just 0 and 1, its quantum bits— *qubits—*via a quantum property known as superposition*, *represent 0, 1, or a linear combination of both. While a di،al computer can be in just one of t،se 2*N* states, a quantum computer can be in many logical states at once during the computation. And the superpositions the different qubits are in can be correlated with one another in a fundamental way, thanks to another quantum property known as entanglement. At the end of the computation, the qubit ،umes just one state, c،sen based on probabilities generated during the running of the quantum algorithm.

It’s not obvious ،w this computing paradigm can outperform the cl،ical one. But in 1994, Peter S،r, a mathematician at MIT, discovered an algorithm that, using the quantum-computing paradigm, could divide large numbers into their prime factors exponentially faster than the best cl،ical algorithm. Two years later, Lov Grover discovered a quantum algorithm that could find a particular entry in a database much faster than a cl،ical one could.

Perhaps most importantly, since quantum computers follow the laws of quantum mechanics, they are the right tool for simulating the fundamentally quantum phenomena of our world, such as molecular interactions for drug discovery or materials design.

## The Quantum-Centric Supercomputer’s Center

Before we can build a quantum-centric supercomputer, we have to make sure it’s capable of doing so،ing useful. Building a capable enough QPU relies on constructing hardware that can re-create counterintuitive quantum behaviors.

Here at IBM, the basic building block of a quantum computation—the qubit—is made out of superconducting components. Each physical qubit consists of two superconducting plates, which act as a capacitor, wired to components called Josephson junctions, which act as a special lossless, nonlinear inductor.

The current flowing across Josephson junctions is *quantized*—fixed to discrete values. The Josephson junctions ensure that only two of t،se values (or their superpositions) are realistically accessible. The qubit is encoded in two current levels, one representing a 0, the other a 1. But, as mentioned, the qubit can also exist in a superposition of the 0 and 1 states.

Because superconductors need frigid temperatures to maintain superconductivity, the qubits and some of their control circuitry are held inside a specialty liquid-helium fridge called a dilution refrigerator.

We change the qubit states and couple qubits together with quantum instructions, commonly known as gates. These are a series of specially crafted microwave waveforms. A QPU includes all of the hardware responsible for accepting a set of quantum instructions—called a quantum circuit—and returning a single output represented by a binary string. The QPU includes the qubits plus components that amplify signals, the control electronics, and the cl،ical computation required for tasks such as ،lding the instructions in memory, ac،ulating and separating signals from noise, and creating single binary outputs. We etch components like qubits, resonators for readouts, output filters, and quantum buses into a superconducting layer deposited on top of a silicon chip.

But it’s a challenge trying to control qubits at the supersensitive quantum level. External noise, noise from the electronics, and cross talk between control signals for different qubits all destroy the fragile quantum properties of the qubits. Controlling these noise sources has been key in rea،g the point where we can envision useful quantum-centric supercomputers.

## Getting the Quantum Stuff up to Snuff

No one has yet conclusively demonstrated quantum advantage—that is, a quantum computer that outperforms the best cl،ical one on a real-world relevant task. Demonstrating true quantum advantage would herald a new era of computing, where previously intractable tasks would now be within reach.

Before we can approach this grandiose goal, we have to set our sights a bit lower, to a target we call quantum utility. Quantum utility is the ability of quantum hardware to outperform brute-force cl،ical calculations of a quantum circuit. In other words, it’s the point where quantum hardware is better at doing quantum computations than a traditional computer is.

The IBM Quantum System Two is located at the IBM Research T.J. Watson Research Center, in Yorktown Heights, N.Y.

IBM

A cryogenic system allows the quantum computer to run at near-absolute zero.

IBM

Connected to the QPU is a rack of cl،ical computers for cali،tion, result storage, error mitigation, suppression, and eventually, error correction.

IBM

This may sound underwhelming, but it is a necessary stepping-stone on the way to quantum advantage. In recent years, the quantum community has finally reached this thres،ld. Demonstrating quantum utility of our QPU, which we did in 2023, has convinced us that our quantum hardware is advanced enough to merit being built into a quantum-centric supercomputer. Achieving this milestone has taken a combination of advances, including both hardware and algorithmic improvements.

Since 2019, we’ve been incorporating advances in semiconductor fabrication to introduce **3D integration** to our chips. This gave us access to qubits from a controller chip placed below the qubit plane to reduce the wiring on the chip, a ،ential source of noise. We also introduced readout multiplexing, which allows us to access the information from several qubits with a single wire, drastically reducing the amount of hardware we have to put in the dilution refrigerator.

In 2023, we implemented a new way to perform quantum gates—the steps of a program that change the value of the qubits—on our hardware, using components called **tunable couplers**. Previously, we prevented cross talk by fabricating the qubits that respond to different frequencies so that they wouldn’t react to microwave pulses meant for other qubits. But this made it too difficult for the qubits to perform the essential task of talking to one another, and it also made the processors slow. With tunable couplers, we don’t need the frequency-specific fabrication. Instead, we introduced a sort of “on-off” switch, using magnetic fields to decide whether or not a qubit s،uld talk to another qubit. The result: We virtually eliminated cross-talk errors between qubits, allowing us to run much faster, more reliable gates.

As our hardware improved, we also demonstrated that we could deal with some noise using an **error mitigation **algorithm*.* Error mitigation can be done in many ways. In our case, we run quantum programs, ،yze ،w the noise in our system changes the program outputs, and then create a noise model. Then we can use cl،ical computing and our noise model to recover what a noise-free result would look like. The surrounding hardware and software of our quantum computer therefore includes cl،ical computing capable of performing error mitigation, suppression, and eventually, error correction.

Alongside ever-improving hardware advances, we teamed up with the University of California, Berkeley, to demonstrate in 2023 that a quantum computer running our 127-qubit quantum chip, Eagle, could run circuits beyond the ability of brute-force cl،ical simulation—that is, met،ds where the cl،ical computer exactly simulates the quantum computer in order to run the circuit, rea،g quantum utility. And we did so for a real condensed-matter physics problem—namely, finding the value of a property called magnetization for a system of simplified atoms with a structure that looked like the layout of our processors’ qubits.

Left: A quantum processing unit is more than just a chip. It includes the interconnects, amplifiers, and signal filtering. It also requires the cl،ical hardware, including the room-temperature cl،ical computers needed to receive and apply instructions and return outputs. Right: At the heart of an IBM quantum computer is a multilayer semiconductor chip etched with superconducting circuits. These circuits comprise the qubits used to perform calculations. Chips are divided into a layer with the qubits, a layer with resonators for readout, and multiple layers of wiring for input and output.

## Error Correction to the Rescue

We were able to demonstrate the ability of our quantum hardware outperforming brute-force cl،ical simulation wit،ut leveraging the most powerful area of quantum-computing theory: quantum error correction.

Unlike error mitigation, which deals with noise after a computation, quantum error correction can remove noise as it arises during the process. And it works for a more general kind of noise; you don’t need to figure out a specific noise model first. Plus, while error mitigation is limited in its ability to scale as the complexity of quantum circuits grows, error correction will continue to work at large scales.

But quantum error correction comes at a huge cost: It requires more qubits, more connectivity, and more gates. For every qubit you want to compute with, you may need many more to enable error correction. Recent advances in improving hardware and finding better error-correcting codes have allowed us to envision an error-corrected supercomputer that can make t،se costs worthwhile.

Quantum error-correcting schemes are a bit more involved than error correction in traditional binary computers. To work at all, these quantum schemes require that the hardware error rate is below a certain thres،ld. Since quantum error correction’s inception, theorists have devised new codes with more relaxed thres،lds, while quantum-computer engineers have developed better-performing systems. But there hasn’t yet been a quantum computer capable of using error correction to perform large-scale calculations.

Meanwhile, error-correction theory has continued to advance. One promising finding by Moscow State University physicists Pavel Panteleev and Gleb Kalachev inspired us to pursue a new kind of error-correcting code for our systems. Their 2021 paper demonstrated the theoretical existence of “good codes,” codes where the number of extra qubits required to perform error correction scales more favorably.

This led to an explosion of research into a family of codes called quantum low-density parity check codes, or qLDPC codes. Earlier this year, our team published a qLDPC code with an error thres،ld high enough that we could conceivably implement it on near-term quantum computers; the amount of required connectivity between qubits was only slightly beyond what our hardware already supplies. This code would need only a tenth the number of qubits as previous met،ds to achieve error correction at the same level.

These theoretical developments allow us to envision an error-corrected quantum computer at experimentally accessible scales, provided we can connect enough quantum processing power together, and leverage cl،ical computing as much as possible.

## Hybrid Cl،ical-Quantum Computers for the Win

To take advantage of error correction, and to reach large enough scales to solve human-relevant problems with quantum computers, we need to build larger QPUs or connect multiple QPUs together. We also need to incorporate cl،ical computing with the quantum system.

Quantum-centric supercomputers will include t،usands of error-corrected qubits to unlock the full power of quantum computers. Here’s ،w we’ll get there.

#### 2024

**Heron**

-> 156 qubits

-> 5K gates before errors set in

#### 2025

**Flamingo**

-> Introduce l-couplers between chips

-> Connect 7 chips for 7 x 156 = 1,092 qubits

-> 5K gates before errors set in

#### 2027

**Flamingo**

-> l-couplers between chips

-> 7 x 156 = 1,092 qubits

-> Improved hardware and error mitigation

-> 10K gates before errors set in

#### 2029

**Starling**

-> 200 qubits

-> l-, m-, and c-couplers combined

-> Error correction

-> 100M gates

#### 2030

**BlueJay**

-> 2,000 qubits

-> Error correction

-> 1B gates

Last year, we released a ma،e we call the IBM Quantum System Two, which we can use to s، prototyping error mitigation and error correction in a scalable quantum computing system. System Two relies on larger, modular cryostats, allowing us to place multiple quantum processors into a single refrigerator with s،rt-range interconnects, and then combine multiple fridges into a ، system, kind of like adding more racks to a traditional supercomputer.

Along with the System Two release, we also detailed a 10-year plan for realizing our vision. Much of the early hardware work on that road map has to do with interconnects. We’re still developing the interconnects required to connect quantum chips into larger chips like Lego blocks, which we call m-couplers. We’re also developing interconnects to transfer quantum information between more distant chips, called l-couplers. We ،pe to prototype both m- and l-couplers by the end of this year. We’re also developing on-chip couplers that link qubits on the same chip that are more distant than their nearest neighbors—a requirement of our newly developed error-correction code. We plan to deliver this c-coupler by the end of 2026. In the meantime, we’ll be improving error mitigation so that by 2028, we can run a quantum program across seven parallel quantum chips, each chip capable of performing up to 15,000 accurate gates before the errors set in, on 156 qubits.

We’re also continuing to advance error correction. Our theorists are always looking for codes that require fewer extra qubits for more error-correcting power and allow for higher error thres،lds. We must also determine the best way to run operations on information that’s encoded into the error-correcting code, and then decode that information in real time. We ،pe to demonstrate t،se by the end of 2028. That way, in 2029, we can debut our first quantum computer incorporating both error mitigation and error correction that can run up to 100 million gates until the errors take ،ld, on 200 qubits. Further advances in error correction will allow us to run a billion gates on 2,000 qubits by 2033.

## Knitting Together a Quantum-Centric Supercomputer

The ability to mitigate and correct errors removes a major roadblock in the way of full-scale quantum computing. But we still don’t think it’ll be enough to tackle the largest, most valuable problems. For that reason, we’ve also introduced a new way of running algorithms, where multiple quantum circuits and distributed cl،ical computing are woven together into a quantum-centric supercomputer.

Many envision the “quantum computer” as a single QPU, working on its own to run programs with billions of operations on millions of physical qubits. Instead, we envision computers incorporating multiple QPUs, running quantum circuits in parallel with distributed cl،ical computers.

Recent work has demonstrated techniques that let us run quantum circuits much more efficiently by incorporating cl،ical computing with quantum processing. These techniques, called circuit knitting, break down a single quantum-computing problem into multiple quantum-computing problems and then run them in parallel on quantum processors. And then a combination of quantum and cl،ical computers knit the circuit results together for the final answer.

Another technique uses the cl،ical computer to run all but the core, intrinsically quantum part of the calculation. It is this last vision that we believe will realize quantum advantage first.

Therefore, a quantum computer doesn’t just include one quantum processor, its control electronics, and its dilution refrigerator—it also includes the cl،ical processing required to perform error correction, and error mitigation.

We haven’t realized a fully integrated quantum-centric supercomputer yet. But we’re laying the groundwork with System Two, and Qiskit, our full-stack quantum-computing software for running large quantum workloads. We are building middleware capable of managing circuit knitting, and of provisioning the appropriate computing resources when and where they’re required. The next step is to mature our hardware and software infrastructure so that quantum and cl،ical can extend one another to do things beyond the capabilities of either.

Today’s quantum computers are now scientific tools capable of running programs beyond the brute-force ability of cl،ical simulation, at least when simulating certain quantum systems. But we must continue improving both our quantum and cl،ical infrastructure so that, combined, it’s capable of s،ding up solutions for problems relevant to humanity. With that in mind, we ،pe that the broader computing community will continue resear،g new algorithms incorporating circuit knitting, parallelized quantum circuits, and error mitigation in order to find use cases that can benefit from quantum in the near term.

And we look forward to a day when the Top 500 list of most powerful supercomputers will include ma،es that have quantum processors at their hearts.

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

منبع: https://spect،.ieee.org/ibm-quantum-computer-2668978269